People in politics Desire to Guard us all From your Evils regarding On-Line Gambling.
This is part 1 of a multipart series of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it does, some facts about the current state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.
The legislators are trying to protect us from something, or are they? The whole thing seems only a little confusing to say the least.
The House, and the Senate, are once more considering the matter of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have already been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.
The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte has got the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all forms of online gambling, to make it illegal for a gambling business to just accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block usage of gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.
In the same way does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, helps it be illegal for gambling businesses to just accept bank cards, electronic transfers, checks and other kinds of payment, but his bill doesn’t address the keeping bets.
The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is basically a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It centers on preventing gambling businesses from accepting bank cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes as to the is currently legal.
Based on Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling is currently illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It is common for illegal gambling businesses to work freely until law enforcement finds and stops them.”
Actually, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Very few states have laws that produce online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes have taken steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some forms of online gambling as being legal.메이저사이트
Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all forms of interstate gambling and account fully for new technologies. Under current federal law, it’s unclear whether using the Internet to work a gambling business is illegal” ;.
Goodlatte’s bill however doesn’t “cover all forms of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for many forms of online gambling such as state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act don’t make online gambling illegal, they ensure it is illegal for a gambling business to just accept online bets the place where a person risks something of value “upon the results of a contest of others, a sporting event, or even a game predominantly susceptible to chance”, except of course when it is circumstances lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or certainly one of a few other situations.
The truth of the problem is that most online gambling businesses have positioned in other countries specifically to steer clear of the gray area that’s the current state of online gambling in the US. As a result, there is little that law enforcement can do to enforce these laws. Trying to help make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, will not make sure they are simpler to enforce.
As well, most, if not all, banks and credit card companies won’t transfer money to an on line gambling business now, consequently of pressure from the federal government. As a result, alternative payment systems sprang as much as fill the void.
Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal usage of payment system instruments, bank cards, and wire transfers.” But once we already know just, most bank cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.
Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is a growing reason for debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry.” If the credit card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S are not allowing the funding of gambling, how can it be “a growing reason for debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we truly need legislation for the financial industry to safeguard itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were a problem for them, wouldn’t they only stop accepting them?